Fiji Elections: Still a Cliffhanger, FijiFirst Hanging on

pn171

 UPDATE. Results announcements put on hold by Electoral Office so that Opposition concerns can be addressed.
____________ 

With the final results from 1715 (79%) of the 2173 polling station now counted, who will form the next Fiji government is still too close to call, although the trend since earlier announcements — and the preliminary results announced on Thursday—  indicate a narrow win for FijiFirst.  

As of 1pm today, FijiFirst had 49.93% of the vote, SODELPA 39.96 and NFP 7.36. The other parties had a combined total of 2.74%, well below the 5% threshold to win a seat. 

What has been most disappointing is the low voter turnout. The atrocious weather did not help but this in itself is an insufficient reason. There are likely to be a mix of reasons but their relative importance will remain unknown.  People could perhaps have chosen not to vote because they are happy with the status quo under FijiFirst, or they could have expected FijiFirst to win, so why bother? Or they could have been overwhelmed and confused by the many pressures to vote from FijiFirst and the pressures and rumours from the Opposition. Or they could have thought the election result would not improve their lives whatever the outcome.

So what can we deduce from the results so far?

Bainimarama's FijiFirst seems likely to win 27 seats, SODELPA 20 and NFP 4 seats in the 51-seat chamber. 

The aim of the 2013 in abolishing race-based elections which favoured the chiefly Taukei appears to be a work "still in progress." 

SODELPA is essentially a Taukei party with 43 of its 51 candidates Taukei, 4 Indo-Fijians and 4 Others. NFP, a traditional Indo-Fijian party, had made serious efforts to be more multi-racial. 19 of its 51 candidates are Taukei, 29 Indo-Fijians and 3 Others. FijiFirst is the most balanced party with 26 Taukei, 23 Indo-Fijian and 2 Others. It even has two chiefs! But no paramount chiefs. Two heads of Confederacies, Ro Teimumu Kepa (Burebasaga) and Naiqama Lalabalavu (Tovata) are SODELPA candidates. The Kubuna  headship is at present vacant.  A Rotuman Pasepa Lagi out-polled Bainimarama and all other candidates in Rotuma. 

A casual examination of voting by the type and location of polling station shows race and parochial interests to still be very evident. People  voting in Taukei villages generally voted SODELPA, no doubt due to the influence of village heads (turaga ni koro). This pattern did not seem to be influenced by whether or not the FijiFirst government had spent money on local development. So much for the social media and Opposition claims that FijiFirst was buying votes. Those in (mainly Indo-Fijian) settlements voted FijiFirst or NFP.  In urban areas voting also seemed to be greatly influenced by race, and to a lesser extent by economic wellbeing.

Three types of polling stations deserve special mention. Those located in military areas voted overwhelmingly for FijiFirst (which reduces the prospect of another coup); police areas were about equally divided between FijiFirst and SODELPA, and Corrections were predominantly SODELPA. 

One further initial observation is the different distribution of candidate preferences.  Bainimarama was the first choice  with 36.8% of  FijiFirst votes. SODELPA's Rabuka only accounted for 17% with other candidates scoring higher than with FijiFirst. Interestingly, Ro Teimumu Kepa only won 1.2% of SODELPA votes.  This suggests more parochially-orientated voting for  SODELPA and perhaps what could be called more nationally-orientated voting with FijiFirst. But individual SODELPA candidates may have been better known in particular locations. 

The geography of how people voted in 2014 and 2018  by polling station would make a very good topic for a master's thesis. There are certainly enough hypotheses to test.

--ACW