By Crosbie Walsh
The non-political news of the week was
the threat of Tropical Cyclone Lusi, that is now only a heavy sea
swell warning; the ongoing type 3 dengue epidemic, a new strain to
Fiji, that has infected between 10,000 -15,000 people, leaving
eleven dead, and the appeal by low-lying Nausori for funding to fight
the epidemic.
The opening of yet another telecentre which gives
schools and local communities access to free internet, this time at Kalabo,
may be considered both political and non-political. Kalabo, just
outside Suva, has served as both a staging ground and retreat by
anti-Bainimarama elements in recent years.
The big political news of the week was
the appointment of Ro Teimumu Kepa as the leader of the SODELPA and
her lengthy 34,000 word inaugural address. Rather too long, I would
have thought, for a news item, but SODELPA protested nonetheless that
the Fiji Sun treated it as an advertisement that needed to be paid
for. The 68-year old was unanimously elected as the leader by the
party management and her election was announced to a meeting of 300 last Thursday.
FLP and NFP leaders were also present.
Most other news derived from her
speech: a denial by the Ministry of Education that religion could no
longer be practised in schools; a claim by the PM that she was
scaremongering on land and religious issues hoping to win the iTaukei
vote; a counter claim by Chaudhry that the PM was "shaken"
by her speech and should be the last one to accuse anyone of being a
racist. How he worked this out is anyone's guess. But the Fiji Sun
took the unusual step of publishing the PM's rebuttal in the iTaukei
language so there must have been some concern that less educated
Fijians might heed the high chief's comments.
Which reminded me of a non-political
and non-Fiji item copied by a Fiji Economic Forum blogger from the
UK's Daily Mail under the heading "Lawn Again Christians"
that could have some resonance in Fiji among the less educated. A
South African preacher made his congregation eat grass to 'be closer
to God' before stamping on them. If you don't believe it, click on the hyperlink to check out
the photos that accompany the article.
Those with knowledge of Ro Teimumu's
political record would not be surprised at her speech. She is on
record as saying there was no need to consult "her" people.
As chief, she knows what was best for them. She was Minister of
Education in the Qarase SDL party, the party that SODELPA has all
but replaced. And she has been a vocal opponent of almost every step
taken by the Bainimarama government, including the People's Charter,
even though her Bishop was co-chairman. She hosted the Methodist
Church conference in Rewa despite government concern it would be used
for political purposes. She used her appointment as chair of the Rewa
Provincial Council to launch a attack on government even though the
Council is a government body whose agenda is limited to Rewa and not
national issues. She opposed the abolition of the Great Council of
Chiefs, the restructuring of the iTaukei Land Trust Board, the
payment of all lease money to the mataqali whose land was leased,
thereby cutting out payments to chiefs, and the Land Banks that again
bypassed chiefs and the iLTB, with legal agreements protecting leasor
and leasee.
But even those with no knowledge of her
political record would have been surprised at a speech that was so
blatantly and unashamedly a call for a return to the "old regime"
where chiefly and iTaukei "rights" were deemed paramount.
The speech addressed no issues that would appeal to all Fijians,
irrespective of race, and offered no new perspectives or promises of
policies addressing all Fijians. It was addressed to iTaukei, not to a supposedly multi-racial party. And its main thrust was an attack on the
Bainimarama government, hoping that ethnic Fijians would forget what
has been done for —and with— them over the past eight years, and
that they could be appealed to again vote back into power the elite
that had most benefited by an appeal to what, in a political context,
are the red herrings of race and religion.
A breakdown of Ro Teimumu's address
God, religion and schooling
An earlier SDL submission to the Ghai
commission wanted Fiji to be declared a Christian state. The 2013
Constitution recognized the right of all Fijians to worship according
to their beliefs but it did not dedicate Fiji to God, Christian or
otherwise. Ro Teimumu criticised this omission:
"We are called now to save our country. We must rededicate Fiji to God, and, with His support, take its destiny into our hands. We should look at this as our sacred duty. I did not at first actively seek the positions of leader and president of the Social Democratic Liberal Party ... But I heard deep in my heart the cry of our islands. I listened; I prayed long and hard and the answers came. And, now, here I am. I am ready...""On this day I declare to you before the nation that SODELPA will always recognize the supreme presence and power of Almighty God.... Bainimarama and Sayed-Khaiyum ... see no place for God in their 2013 Constitution. They made this decision without the permission of the people and then declared that it had our approval. How dare they? "
She went on to say that "a senior
official in the Ministry of Education has given written advice
following questions raised by Suva Grammar School, a government
school. This official, from the ethics and disciplinary unit, states
that Christian prayers at
Suva Grammar are unconstitutional."
The blog Fiji Today took up the call
with a heading "It is now illegal to pray at school". But
it transpires that Ro Teimumu had got it all wrong. Education
Minister Filipe Bole said no such directive has been issued, and the
Suva Grammar School management had only sent letters to parents
asking if they wanted to allow or disallow their children
attending prayers.
Since then, Sanatan and Methodist schools have
publicly stated they have no problem with the constitution or with
parents giving or withholding permission for their children to attend
prayers and other religious instruction. But Ro Teimumu has not
retracted her accusations.
The old new policy
In most other respects Ro Teimumu's
policies were similar to the policies of the SDL-led government prior
to their ousting in 2006.
After saying that "SODELPA commits
itself to building a prosperous and unified nation, based on
democratic values, the rule of law, fundamental human rights and
social justice and to ensure equal opportunities for all." she
outlined policies that to this writer appeared to contradict
democratic values and could not possibly unify the nation, namely,
- The reinstatement of the Great Council of Chiefs
- The reintroduction of scholarships based on race
- The revocation of the Land Use Decree and Mahogany decrees that opened land for use with guarantees for all concerned parties
- The removal of impositions on the Methodist Church (that the Church has earlier accepted as it moved to become a non-political organisation)
- All itaukei land to be managed only by the Itaukei Land Trust Board and "the equal distribution of lease money to landowning units will also be reviewed as she claims the current system is effectively destroying the communal foundation of the indigenous Fijian society."
- Asking the Supreme Court about the status of the 1997 constitution (with the clear intention of its re-introduction).
- Reviewing the legality of the Fiji National Provident Fund's unilateral reductions of pension entitlements to ensure that pension contractual agreements are honoured. (The Fund would be unsustainable if the old pension levels were reintroduced.)
One new development in SODELPA
organization that could prove very effective in getting people to vote, and vote for the SODELPA, is the formation of women and youth branches, the latter
headed by Pita Waqanovonovo, once a leader of an aborted protest
march on Suva, now a likely candidate for a seat in parliament.
A multi-part government
Ro Teimumu said if SODELPA won, it
would resume a multi-party government with the Fiji Labour Party and
would invite like-minded parties to join.
Fiji Labour Party leader Mahendra
Chaudhry said after the meeting that they have been working together
under the United Front for a Democratic Fiji (UFDF). National
Federation Party president, Raman Pratap Singh, said: “Under our
umbrella (UFDF) we have been here for the last two years and that is
an understanding between the parties as the leader of SODELPA has
said that we will be fighting the elections on our own. We have an
understanding and we are working with that understanding.”
Chaudhry's involvement is not surprising. Once the SDL's bitter enemy, he now sees his best chance, with his Indo-Fijian support base falling mainly due to emigration, to exercise some measure of power is in coalition with his former enemies. His previous "coalitions" hint at a very short coalition this time round. As for the NFP, already overshadowed by Chaudhry and not really needed by SODELPA, I think they have sounded the dead knell on Fiji's oldest political party.
Meanwhile, the PM is still to announce
details on his new party.
Ro Teimumu's full speech and PM
Bainimarama's response are published separately.
3 comments:
Reversing equal distribution of lease money with landowning units getting crumb and chiefs getting lion's share means that in effect, chiefs own the land. They gain and profit from it. Indigenous Fijians own land in name only. It makes them feel good even if they do not get any returns. For landowners units, landownership becomes a hallow concept. This shows how elements of the chiefly system can be parasitic. But if Fijians prefer it to be such, who are we to say.
Can any iTaukei landowner comment on how much the lease money has changed under the current system compared to the previous one? If you know how the chief versus commoner amounts have changed that would be interesting to know.
I believe that the most interesting political news was the our PM has again delayed the announcement of his party, while fully engaging in campaigning with his rebuttal of Ro Teimumu's speech. This is very smart politicking and will pay off big time for him. He can use all the resources of government to attack the racist and corrupt policies of his opponents without going through the hoops of the political party decree. He does not have to declare his families assets and he does not have to collect signatures and establish offices. I congratulate him for his smartness which clearly contradicts the often peddled notion that he is nothing more that a bumbling military moron whose only interest is filling his pockets.
Post a Comment