Pn55 |
Today's comment was to criticise the announcement of a working group to
develop a fair pay framework. Bridges called this "more talk,
more slogans (and) the 153th working group." If this sounds like
too much consultation to Bridges, it could in part be a consequence of the lower level of consultations under National that has led to the need for
redress under the present Government.
One wonders whether tomorrow he'll be criticising the government's plan to
establish a Business Advisory Council to be chaired by former Air New
Zealand CEO Christopher Luxon. The PM hopes the Council will provide
Government with "high level free and frank advice on key
economic issues and harness expertise from the private sector to
develop government's economic.policies.' Free meaning open, not
costless for, of course, the process is costly as ACT leader David
Seymour has pointed out. Whether it would be more costly not to
consult is another question.
An
advisory council is different from a working party. It has direct,
ongoing contact with Government while working parties are more
typically one-off affairs with some ongoing contact, at the other end
of the spectrum, that later may lead to the sort of relationship
enjoyed by advisory councils.
Criticising Government is fine. That's a large part of an Opposition's job. It keeps Government on its toes. . But it also needs to actually say something new. To show why it would be the better government. Repeated criticism is unlikely to have this effect..
On
what may appear to be a completely unrelated topic -- although an
informed public is is an essential part of a democracy -- I had a quick
check through today's 1 News Now items. Of the 40-odd listed, Simon
Bridges was mentioned once, Jacinda Adern and Government four times -- the
same as Australian mentions--,six were on crime, and 14 were on sports and
sports personalities. Umm!
-- ACW
-- ACW
No comments:
Post a Comment