Pn40 |
Mentioned by 5% or less
were "disaster assistance, unity, the economy, the environment,
corruption, good governance, political stability, welfare, and human
rights."
Tebbutt and the Fiji
Times did not reveal exactly how the questions were asked but it
seems to have been in the form of a prepared list to which those
interviewed responded yes or no. I think it would have to be using
Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) explained in an
earlier posting. (see 2. Comparing Three
Sample Polling Methods.) CATI is less reliable as more poll questions increase. This poll had 17 on what pollers thought and a matching number on how the issues affected them, 34 questions in all.
I have some doubts
about whether less educated people would understand some of these
terms, and wonder whether some interviews were conducted in a vernacular. Whatever ... as the Times states they do provide "a
glimpse of how people are thinking." Attempting a statistical
analysis would be near impossible.
What is interesting is
the high places give to tangible concepts (cost of living, wages, etc.) that all would understand
and the much lower places given to more abstract concepts such as
good governance. political stability and human rights which, if
the opposition to the Bainimarama government is anything to go on,
are the primary concerns of the educated urban elite, SODELPA and
the National Federation Party.
What is the cause? The
abstraction or are "ordinary" Fijians really less affected
and concerned about human rights whose restrictions affect them less?
For the full Fiji Times
article, which also includes comments by USP economist Dr Neelesh
Gounder, click here,click here.
And if your appetite is not yet sated, read the results of another Tebbutt poll, on elected or appointed mayors on which Dr Gounder also comments.
-- ACW.
-- ACW.
No comments:
Post a Comment