Challenges for Principals of secondary schools and colleges in Fiji: Leadership, Integrity and Excellence1
By
Professor
Biman Prasad
Professor
Economics
The
University of the South Pacific
- Introduction
The
President of Fiji Principals Association, School Principals, invited
guests, ladies and gentlemen. I thank you for the invitation to
address you on your conference theme on leadership, integrity and
excellence. All three are very important attributes for the future of
education and the well-being of our nation.
I
feel very much honored to have been invited to the Principals
conference. As a secondary school student, I had the privilege of
studying under three very fine Principals: the late Valekuta Mateni,
Mr. Setareki Delana and Mr. Amraiya Naidu. These three individuals
showed great dedication, selflessness and passion for the welfare and
development of students. They were role models for many of us. The
way they led the school had a lasting and significant impact on the
lives of many of us students. In fact, my dream when I was in
secondary school was not only to become a teacher, but also a
principal.
I
did not have the opportunity to become a principal, but today I feel
very proud that my brother, Anil Prasad, is a Principal of a
secondary school.
The
role of School Principals in fostering leadership, integrity and
excellence in our school children, and the community at large, is
vital. It cannot be underestimated or downplayed. I will expound on
this theme later on. But first, let me say a few words about how we
have fared since independence in 1970, including its implications for
education.
As
we all know, Fiji has been caught in a coup cycle since 1987.
Economically, we have stagnated in the last 26 years as a result of
four coups. This has resulted in an increase in poverty from a low of
7% in the 1970s, to an estimated current high of more than 40%. In
other countries like India and China, poverty has generally declined.
It shows Fiji is regressing while others, like Singapore and
Mauritius for example, are forging ahead. These two latter countries
are somewhat comparable to Fiji. At one time, Fiji outranked them in
terms of growth indicators. Now Fiji is well behind both of them.
In
the last 6 years, Fiji has gone through various challenges
characterized by uncertainty and poor economic performance, although
since 2011, the economy has shown some sustained improvements. We
have reason to be cautiously optimistic. We now have a new
Constitution in place. Government has outlined plans for elections
before September 30, 2014. While the process of arriving at this
Constitution may not have been the best, the fact is that we now have
a Constitution which has been implemented. We need to move forward
with urgency. We have a lot of catching up to do. We can’t afford
any more coups. We need to ensure that we provide the leadership that
builds on the positive aspects of the new Constitution. This is where
the theme of your conference – leadership, integrity and
excellence – could not have been more timely. As I mentioned
before, these values not only relevant to your work in schools, but
to the nation as a whole.
Earlier
this year I talked about the status of teachers at the Fiji Teachers
Union conference. I highlighted how teachers can provide leadership
to promote democracy in our country. I revisit this crucial theme in
my talk today before I talk about leadership.
- Democracy in the schools and classrooms
None
of us as parents would want to send our children to a school where
they cannot freely express themselves through debate and discussions.
This would be counterproductive to their personal and professional
development. I believe that our society dreams of democracy for its
children. We want our children to grow up in a free, open, and
transparent democratic framework.
This
is not the least because creativity and innovation in education is
best promoted through democratic teaching and learning.
Indeed, it has been established through research over so many years
that a creative person must have autonomy. He or she must be
connected to the wider society, both locally and internationally, for
ideas. He or she must develop a delicate balance between obedience
and disobedience.
Therefore,
the environment in which our children study can determine whether
they become conformists, or creativists. Principals therefore have an
important role in creating a school environment and moulding our
students to be creative and equally crucially critically minded.
Creativeness, innovativeness and critical thinking are the bedrock of
success at the national and international levels. Principals must
create the right environment in their schools to release our
children’s creativity so that they, and their country, can
flourish.
By
creating such a school environment, we will avoid creating a
‘nation of sheep’.
As
Gandhi once said “Democracy is not a state in which people act like
sheep. Under democracy individual liberty of opinion and action is
jealously guarded”. School
Principals and Teachers have an important responsibility in this
regard to uphold academic freedom, to articulate different views,
engage in free discourse, reason without rancor and debate important
issues affecting the country and the world.
So
what can Principals do to educate our children in democratic norms?
For one, they can instill democratic values by having elections for
school prefect. This will help students at an early age to understand
the process of elections and of the value of choosing their own
leaders. It will also teach accountability and transparency.
- Status of Principals
Let
me now make some remarks on the status of Principals. The School
environment is an important democratic space. Principals and teachers
therefore play a crucial role in the cultivation of democratic
imagination.
In
Fiji we can safely say that as a country we have been able to
continuously improve our educational objectives, policies,
programmes, curricula, text books, and physical infrastructure.
However, principals and teachers remain the single most important
factor in determining the quality of teaching. The ability to attract
highly motivated, skilled and committed individuals, and retaining
them in the profession, is absolutely vital for improving the quality
of education in the increasingly challenging global environment.
The
retention of principals and teachers is linked to their economic
status in that they need to be fairly rewarded for the important work
they do. Principals as leaders have a significant responsibility in
managing the finances, staff, students and facilities. Additionally,
they are required to play and active community role. To attract good
leaders, the government ought to review the Principals salaries to
bring it to the level of responsibilities that Principals have in
schools.
There are only175 secondary schools in Fiji. If we were to increase the salaries of Principals next year by $10,000 across the board, we would have raised the starting salary of the lowest level 4C principal’s salary to $38,304 and the starting salary of $49,529 for the highest level 1D Principal. The highest level Principals salary after a $10,000 increase would still amount to less than 25% of the salary of the highest paid permanent secretary as of now. The total extra budget that the Ministry would need to raise the Principals’ salary by $10,000 across the board would amount to $1.75 million. This is a small price to pay for the benefits that will be returned. This is a small, but wise, investment that will bring us good returns. I would urge the government and the Ministry of Education to look seriously into this matter.
Secondly,
the social status of Principals is also important. All my three
principals in the 1970s and 1980s had very high social status. Back
then there was public recognition and acceptance of Principals as
leaders and leading opinion makers in society. They were respected by
students and communities alike as promoting moral and ethical
standards in society. That status might be less evident today, and it
may be because of the erosion of professional pride and professional
commitment. It is also due to the deteriorating moral and ethical
standards amongst some of our Principals.
The
status of Principals and teachers has also been affected negatively
in an environment of political instability and uncertainty. This has
been the case since 1987, with no end in sight as yet. Many
experienced Principals and teachers and school administrators had to
leave the service abruptly to migrate as a result of the
discrimination they perceived in the civil service. To make matters
worse, the Bainimarama government implemented an ill-conceived
retirement policy, which effectively shuts out productive and
experienced Principals after the age of 55.
I am
pleased to say that this policy, which was included in the draft
Constitution, has now been removed and it is no longer part of the
2013 Constitution. However, government should immediately change its
teacher retirement policy of 55 years to 60. It does not make any
economic or educational sense to have a retirement age of only 55 in
the civil service and least of all in the teaching profession where
experience is vital. It is misguided that reducing the retirement age
will help reduce unemployment and provide younger people more
opportunities. All it will do is deny us the benefit of quality
principals, teachers and administrators.
The
public service in Fiji should not be considered as major generator of
employment. Employment for young will be generated through better and
sustained economic growth led by the private sector. The sooner
government does away with the 55 retirement age policy in the civil
service the better. In Papua New Guinea, the Public Service
Commission is thinking of increasing the retirement age from 60 to
63.
- New Leadership in Schools
Let me
now turn to leadership, integrity and excellence by highlighting that
there is a difference between a leader and a manager. According to
management expert, Peter Drucker “Management is doing things right;
leadership is doing the right things” My view is that most
Principals are good managers but I am not sure if they are also good
leaders. Management is about operational issues, managing the day to
day affairs but Leadership is about providing and having a vision to
lead an organization. As you can see, the distinction is very
important.
Once
you define and articulate the vision for your schools you will need
to build a team to take the organization forward. Leaders would not
be able to do this if they have too much pride, greed, anger, hatred
and an excess of ego. Good leaders have humility, integrity, self
reflexivity and honesty at all times.
Integrity
is vital for good leadership. What is integrity and how can we build
that in our leadership? Gus
Lee & Diane Elliott-Lee, in their book, “Courage: The
Backbone of Leadership”
define integrity as follows and I quote:
“Integrity
is acting for what is right. When we do this, we feel whole and
uniquely powerful.”
It
is always important for Principals to differentiate between the right
and wrong. As leaders, if we are not able to do that, than we would
be sending a wrong signal to our students. Equally important is to
cultivate not just a moral but an ethical sensibility.
When
your colleagues and students; your school management and your
community trust and respect you, it is because you as principals
possess and embody certain admirable qualities that inspire them.
These qualities include humility, understanding, and tolerance of
others’ points of views rather than being dictatorial and
unapproachable in your dealings with students.
Any
form of
dictatorship
in school leadership is not going to work in this day and age.
Principals should be able to create an environment of collegial
debate, allow different view-points amongst students and staff and
nurture dissent and respectful disagreement to move towards
innovation and excellence.
Some
Principals complain about the lack of student, parent and community
support. These principals have to question why. They must also look
within. Could it be because of the failure of Principals to engage
effectively with the parent and community? Principals should find
innovative ways of engaging parents. It is not enough to have a
parent-teachers meeting once in a year. Parents could be engaged at
different levels. Principals could, for example, organise informal
talks, discussions, social events and workshops at different form
levels with teachers and parents. Parents could be involved in
organizing sports events, debates, school bazaars, talents quests,
gardening etc. Such collaborations can build and strengthen
school-community ties. The community becomes part of the school.
Another
dimension that is adding to the increasingly complex role of
Principals is the increasing rate of urbanization. The future
communities in our country and elsewhere around the world will be
urban communities. While urbanization will bring with it new
opportunities it will also present special challenges for education
or children. With more freedom of choice and exposure externalities
such as drug, truancy, crime and urban poverty, Principals will have
an even bigger challenge to deal with these issues in schools.
Let
me add innovation to your sub-theme of excellence. Innovation and
excellence is what is going to define the success of our education
system. It is excellence in what we do as a country will determine
our place in the world. In this age of globalization we have to be
competitive. We can only compete if we promote excellence in our
people.
We
can no longer rely solely on traditional social institutions such as
families, churches and other religious and social institutions to
inculcate the virtues of good leadership, ethics and integrity and
excellence. In fact many religious organisations and leaders have
failed miserably in the past to deal with issues of integrity, ethics
and good leadership amongst their members, especially amongst youth.
Since 1987, we have seen the ‘immorality of silence’ amongst many
of the religious organisations and leaders.
Many
of them allowed politicians and public officials to diminish the
office they occupied by succumbing to their immoral, unethical
leadership roles in our society. Many of these self-serving religious
organisations leaders have a lot to explain when it comes to
addressing the social and moral decline in our societies and in our
children. Given the failure of many of these religious
organisations and their leaders, I am convinced that the only
effective social institutions that can promote the virtues of
excellence are the schools. It is therefore vital that Principals
understand this role and become role models for students. I urge you
all to rethink your roles, go beyond the normal bureaucratic ministry
of education laid rules in the school to build effective
collaborative strategies with parents and the community to serve the
students. As principals you can leave lasting legacies for our future
generations.
I
now turn to another subject in relation to excellence. In many
countries excellence is actually measured against global rankings.
Benchmarking and measuring against global standards is important for
us as a country. The most widely used measure of excellence is based
on the OECD introduced Programme for International Student Assessment
(PISA) in 2000. Creating an identity of excellence in our children
and in our teachers can take us far. But too often we have
concentrated our energy on other forms of identity – ethnic,
religious, provincial and regional. What we should focus on is our
children’s capacity to excel in positive endeavours and exploit
this to the full.
The
McKinsey 2007 report on “How the World’s best performing school
systems come out on top” identified three issues in relation to
high performing schools:
- The quality of an education system cannot exceed the quality of its teachers;
- The only way to improve outcomes is to improve instruction, and;
- Achieving universally high outcomes is only possible by putting in place mechanisms to ensure that schools deliver high quality instruction to every child
Additionally,
in its 2010 report, “How the World’s Most Improved School Systems
Keep Getting Better” it concluded that a system could become
better, no matter what its starting point, given a sustained
leadership and a focus on key interventions necessary for systematic
improvement. This report highlights the important role of principals,
who have to be not only managers, but also leaders.
As
you are aware, our economy and our society are constantly influenced
by the vagaries of global issues. No longer can countries and
societies isolate themselves from international imperatives and
needs. We have to therefore produce global citizens. We have to steer
our student’s abilities and behaviour in a way that they are not
only able to deal with their own cultural and national contexts, but
they also develop skills and knowledge that will be applicable beyond
their national boundaries.
Let me
conclude by saying that in the last 13 years, several reforms have
been implemented relating to the curriculum and assessment management
of schools. Many of them were perhaps long overdue. It is important
to import and adapt new systems that have been tried elsewhere. But
we need to be mindful of the context and the readiness of our
infrastructure to support changes.
- Time for another Education Commission in to Fiji’s Education System
The
last Education Commission report on Fiji’s education system was
done 13 years ago. Another inquiry is long overdue. It is now time
for another Education Commission. The next Education Commission
should be based on a detailed analysis of the outputs and outcomes
that has been achieved through our education system in the last
thirteen years. Fiji’s future economic and social progress will
depend on the kind of excellence we can bring out from our
educational systems. Fiji’s national productivity compared to many
other similar countries is much lower partly because of lack of
excellence in the educational system which has suffered due to coups
and political instability.
- Concluding Comments
In
conclusion, let me say that Fiji is again on the cusp of another
critical juncture and that is the next general election. It should
not matter much who wins the next election. What should and would
matter is how those who win lead the country. Leadership based on
greed, destructive envy, exclusivity, racial discrimination, lack of
moral consciousness and leadership devoid of any ethical sensibility
will not serve the country well. What we will need is leadership
based on integrity, excellence and inclusiveness. Fiji’s misfortune
over the last 27 years has been that democracy- whatever its
shortcoming- was not allowed to function because of military coups.
The democratic deficit is huge and will require leadership,
excellence and integrity in all our institutions including our
military to reduce that. One hopes that after the General Elections,
we would have all learnt our lessons to strive towards sustaining
democracy, rule of law through good leadership.
As
Principals you are leading children who are mainly aged between 14
and 18. In twenty years’ time these children will between the ages
of 34 and 38. They constitute a critical demographic bank as future
voters. By then many of you would have retired. Imagine the legacy
you can leave behind in terms of leadership qualities with these
students if you do your part. When you look back from your rocking
chairs, you will have reason to feel satisfied.
Students
respect their principals a lot. Take it from me that they all look
upon you as role models. Their expectation of you as a leader is that
you will give them lasting influences that would help them develop
their skills, knowledge, and cultivate attributes such as integrity,
leadership and excellence. Their parents put great faith in you. They
expect you to have the welfare of their boys and girls in your
hearts. Do not let students, parents, and this country down.
I thank
you all and I do hope that in the next two days you will have some
serious discussions about your roles and we can improve the
opportunities for good leadership not only in schools but build a
foundation for excellence and integrity in leadership at the national
level. I thank once again for the invitation and it is my pleasure to
declare your conference open.
1
Keynote address delivered at the Fiji Principals Conference held on
25 September, 2013 at the Labasa Khastriya Hall.
7 comments:
A nation of sheep.. Interesting that Dr Prasad calls for Education Commission for Fiji and neglects the need for reform within his own profession. Perhaps all Economists are sheep, following the herd without venturing too far out of the Bretton Woods system of current accounts and the flawed definition of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) established by John Keynes in 1944.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_conference
Since 2008, Global Financial Crisis there has not been a drastic change in the curriculum with Economics.
The obsession of GDP growth has led the world down a garden path of destruction.
Even Democractic nations were the cheer leaders in reducing oversight and regulation that were in place since the 1930's "The Great Depression". For a more detailed account, refer to the Charles Fergurson's documentary Inside Job https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_Job_%28film%29
Movie Trailer
It was revealed by the Inside Job the Professors, within Universities are involved in a conspiracy to teach flawed models of economics.
Bottom line, if Economists like Dr. Prasad would lecture the nation on change, perhaps he should be the vanguard of reform within his own backyard first.
Those are the variables which Dr. Prasad can directly control and changing that mindset of sheep within his own Economic profession is established by changing the manner of how Economics is taught in Universities.
A politican cum professor who on one hand butters Govt and the other hand throws the dirty linen at them.
Interesting that he ask for a pay rise for them because his brother is a principal.
Could he tell the nation that he was getting $250k when he was dean of the faculty.
Argentina under its President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner has been falsifying its inflation statistics. Apparently, this is deemed to be acceptable for purposes best known to itself? But, the measurements are flawed and the outcomes can no longer be hidden. The Economist is 'on to it'. Eventually, the markets will take it up with direst of consequences. Are the Malvinas part of this ruse?
Biman is preaching and pontificating about excellence, academic freedom, integrity, acting for what is right, blah, blah, blah. He is concerned about principals sending students the wrong signal. One has to wonder how much of these values are practiced at USP. Where was Biman when his longtime friend VC Rajesh Chandra sacked Wadan Narsey? Is this academic freedom, USP style? Biman you have heard of clean your own backyard first. I suggest you email your speech to Rajesh Chandra and have a chat with him. Your friend rajesh Chandra and USP need your sermon more than anyone else.
LOL, all the comments so far are Ad Hominem attacks. Could it be that his opponents can't argue with his actual statements and the only way to respond is to launch irrelevant attacks?
@ Tin Con Beef, I'm in total agreement with you. It's very sad.
The good professor is buttering his bread on both sides...
Post a Comment