Croz: When these decisions are made, how are they made? Is it around the table?
Well, we still do a proper process of horizontal coordination and consultation for decisions. There is a policy for a provision prepared. We will take that and a number of ministries are involved like for housing there is Lands Department, there is PSC, there is public works. So we consult and prepare a paper and present to Cabinet.
Croz: How are talks with the Unions?
Parmesh Chand: We're not consulting them at the moment because the issue is that they are not coming in good faith. Everything they come in, they adopt an extreme position. We would rather consult the employees directly or be mindful of what the implications are for the employees, rather than engaging with the Unions who more times than not try to block everything we do.
Like the other day, we wanted to charge a fee for deducting union subscriptions, like unions want, from the employees pay roll, a deduction at source. We have been doing this at $15 a month regardless of what the holding is
We went to unions and said: Look, we want a change in this. If the union dues are $100,000 a year we want 5%. That’s the figure we plucked up from the air. They said we are not prepared to give anything more than 0 % at the moment, so they are still paying $15. We could see were the logic was coming from.
Especially we spent quite a bit of money on inputting the data and if there is an era we have to go back and correct that error it takes a lot of time and money and people keep coming and saying oh don’t union bill and all sorts of instructions.
Croz: Why is the union acting like this?
Parmesh Chand: I think they have to change their mindset to come and be a party to the reforms because the reforms are meaning good things like employee participation if I involve the unions they will say no no no redundancies we don’t want this and they are not prepared to talk about the second best option.
Croz: With redundancy focussing on retraining people in new areas such as setting up their own company, you'd think the unions would be more co-operarative?
Parmesh Chand: Yes, they have to now adjust themselves to marketing their services more for this kind of things but rather than a straight cut union due deduction they have to play a more advisory role and be actively involved in reshaping the future of employment in the public service.
Case study : Singapore’s Trade Unions have a different relationship compared to western partners. So these are some of the reforms it’s not all about slashing the numbers of employees in the civil service and getting this much savings it’s all about turning around the civil service firstly you would need to have the right type of civil service and secondly to see what are the competencies of civil service and where we should be involved and thirdly to get more consistent resources.
3 comments:
So let me get this straight: Parmesh Chand accuses the unions of acting in bad faith and then admits to making a grab at union dues based on a "figure we plucked up [sic] from the air".
Wow! Surely someone as efficient as the good permanent secretary should have at his disposal the exact cost of running union deductions on their behalf.
To be sure ... many unions in Fiji are run by incredibly petty people, but what a wonderful example of why they have little faith in or respect for the PSC.
Croz
This gives some clarity on how decisions are currently made in Fiji under the junta. I now have a better understanding of why things are in the state they are.
Is this what we have had 4 years of termoil for?
Post a Comment