Cogito, ergo sum. I think, therefore I am. (René Descartes, mathematician and philosopher,1599-1650)

Thursday, 21 January 2010

Extending Engagement


Extending Engagement*
by Scott MacWilliam

Now that New Zealand has started to recognise the need to change its previous hard-line against the military regime in Fiji, a range of suggestions are being made about the most appropriate policy changes. One move, proposed by Croz Walsh in a recent issue of this blog, is for the removal of travel sanctions which have discouraged some of Fiji’s most talented people from applying for government positions. The reasoning behind this proposal is impeccable, and needs to be taken further with the removal of blanket sanctions on all personnel serving in the current government and administration.

The sanctions only apply to travel to Australia and New Zealand. PM Bainimarama and other senior officers have had no difficulty visiting other countries, including the USA. Sri Lankan legal officers have been able to travel to Fiji via East Asia. In terms of effectiveness as a means of isolating the regime these bans are little more than an inconvenience, but one which marks Australia and New Zealand out as particularly mean-spirited and petty.

There is also a lack of political logic in the travel bans. As has been frequently pointed out, the RFMF is distinct by comparison to other South Pacific countries’ military forces because of its professionalism. Many members of the RFMF have had international training as well as extensive overseas experience, including in peace-keeping duties. The role of this professionalism in maintaining discipline and preventing major splits within the military has so far been important, if easily underestimated.

The RFMF’s senior officers are well aware of international norms regarding the most appropriate role for soldiers in democratic countries. This awareness is evidenced each time PM Bainimarama speaks of the RFMF’s current objective as one of bringing ‘real democracy’ to Fiji. Advocating ‘one vote one value’ as the basis of an electoral system is promoting one such norm, and the regime’s attachment to it is an indicator of their internationalism.

Despite acknowledging the importance of international education and military experience, regime critics have taken the perverse step of urging that travel sanctions be imposed as a punitive measure. Blocking Fijian soldiers from serving in UN peace-keeping forces is also supposedly desirable, even while acknowledging that it is this experience which has contributed to the RFMF’s professionalism. The RFMF should be wise in the ways of the democratic world – but its members should not have the experience of visiting the nearest liberal democratic countries!

With travel bans removed, or at least only applied in a selective manner where particular soldiers and others have engaged in offensive and vicious behaviour, Australian and New Zealand officials could engage more broadly with the regime’s senior personnel. The next generation of officers could be given the benefits of an international education in countries with stronger democratic traditions. PM Bainimarama and his closest advisers could be encouraged to visit Australia and New Zealand to engage personally with critics and empathizers alike. Australian Foreign Minister and former Labor Party operative Stephen Smith could even explain in detail the lengthy and difficult process by which gross malapportionment has been removed from the Australian electoral system!

The ever-present danger is that members of the RFMF will get used to being in power and become entrenched in attitudes that are undemocratic. Typically, the longer militaries are in office, even those which commence with the goal of returning to civilian rule, the more prone these are to considering themselves as a preferable substitute to the seemingly chaotic inefficiencies of elected governments.

Actions which isolate the military regime, even ineffective ones, will only encourage anti-democratic behaviour. Further elevating paranoia and increasing the possibility of internal fragmentation with the potential for civil war is in no one’s best interests.

While it is admirable that governments in Australia and New Zealand have continued some of their aid and development activities in Fiji, it is time to take additional steps which encourage further international experience for the Bainimarama government’s most important personnel. Removing travel sanctions against all government officials would be one such step.

* Lectures on development policy and poverty reduction in the Crawford School at the ANU. Previously taught public administration, governance and comparative politics at the University of the South Pacific, and the University of Papua New Guinea.




1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Extending Engagement:

Scott MacWilliam quite correctly refers to the illogic of the travel bans. They are illogical because they deter the means to move us towards a democratic process. Many of us would maintain that we never enjoyed democracy in Fiji. Indeed, our vestigial democratic rights were subverted: ONCE by an electoral system and process quite unsuited to Fiji and which has proved even more divisive; SECOND by persons motivated purely by racism and greed who took advantage of this inappropriate electoral system and rigged it.....twice! Some of them are now in the Court Process.

The test for extending engagement must surely be the calibre of people with whom you intend to make this engagement. Are they: honest/intelligent/capable/of good faith in their dealings/dedicated to improving the lot of the ordinary citizen equitably? Are they commited to the eradication of all forms of corruption within the State? And of personal corruption? Do they have demonstrated integrity over a period of time?

The Judicial System and its application is the most immediate place to test this 'good intent'. For years it has failed us all in Fiji: glaringly. The Party Political System has done likewise. It was racist/corrupt/inept/subverted to do anything but enhance the standard of living of the people. Politicians themselves became caricatures: almost no concept of serving the people: Let us Enrich Ourselves by no matter which route!

These tests are simple to apply. It is also evident, more than just evident, that the Media in Fiji have found themselves incapable of applying such tests through smart, dedicated investigative reporting. But, the failure of the local media has been reinforced by that of the overseas media. The Michael Fields, Barbara Dreavers and reporters of this ilk have failed Fiji and all its citizens in their inability to seek the truth with diligence and persistence. Now, spend an hour or two with CNN or even AL Jazeera or the BBC in Haiti. We see a completely different 'take' on things. It ought not to have taken three years for this to have been properly ascertained. TIME Inc was getting there early on but then "dropped off". WHY? Did they early understand what a monumental task was required? And that it might only be achieved by unorthodox means? Watch the Israelis in Haiti. Watch them closely. They know what they must do and they get on with it. My goodness me, do they ever.