CCF Welcomes Lifting of PER

Lifting of PER Restores Fundamental UDHR Freedoms 
[My underlining -- Croz] 


The Citizens’ Constitutional Forum has been calling for the Public Emergency Regulation to be lifted since April 2009 and welcomes the announcement by Bainimarama that it will cease from January 7th, 2012.
“It is good as the PER fundamentally restricted people and ordinary citizens to be engaged in discussions on key issues which will dominate the next few years. Interestingly under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights these freedoms of assembly (Article 20) and opinion ( Article 19) were curtailed and violated with the imposition of PER, says CEO Reverend Akuila Yabaki.
“The lifting of the PER is a good sign by government as it represents a credible step in the right direction. But it is the first, belated as it is, and we may need to focus on this  an opportunity for the many more steps,” says Rev. Yabaki.
“The media Decree will now be allowed to be tested as the Duplication in Section 16 of the PER is covered by the Section 80 of the Media Decree which prohibits publication and broadcast of material which would give rise to public disorder. 

The PER,  however, restricted assembly and this is the fundamental difference meaning that groups, political, social, church can now freely exercise their fundamental right to sit and discuss issues.”
“This freedom means that potential spoilers will also be allowed the same freedoms. They must be allowed to express their views so the debate and discussion on key national issues and the way forward represents the view of all citizens of Fiji, a country of diverse people stresses Rev. Yabaki.
“In a way the blogs will no longer dominate political discussion. The other concern area
is if the media entities will quickly refrain from Self Censorship and adjust to practicing a
freedom and responsibility that is fundamental to all.”
“Opinion makers offshore must also acknowledge that the lifting of the PER has a lot to
do with the work by CSO’s over the last 3 years. The series of dialogues at the different
levels allowing space for reasoning out the call for the removal of PER. CCF has rather
been unrelenting in its call for the removal of PER and yet at the same time we have had
to apply for Permits. Last year alone we had to apply for about 70 Permit Applications for
each event and activity, 2010 about 80 permits applications” says Rev. Yabaki.
“The process is the first step and the real test if the current regime can shoulder the
diverse opinion some of which will be negative and critical and allow the groups to
assemble and talk freely without having to resort to the imposition of PER again. The
fact is if this freedom is not practiced with responsibility we may find ourselves back to
restrictions and this may delay the processes that promise to return us back to
sustainable democracy” stresses Rev. Yabaki.
“Lifting of the PER must be understood in the concept that it allows us our fundamental
freedom of expression. The work for Sustainable Democracy is in the Constitutional
Work, the Electoral Reform, A legitimate Consultation Process, the preparation of the
people for the polls and looking at the truth and reconciliation issues together with the
exit strategy for the current regime” stated Rev. Yabaki.
For further information please contact the communications team at CCF on
……………………….
Reverend Akuila Yabaki
CEO - CCF
The CCF is a non-government organization that educates and advocates for good
governance, human rights and multiculturalism in Fiji. We are not aligned with any
political party.

 

Comments

Imprimatur said…
Critical opinion is not per se negative opinion. Critical opinion requires evidence and this evidence must be capable of verification and testing. It is in this exact area that the Fiji Media especially the Print Press has been so wanting over such a prolonged period of time. They will now need to get quickly and smartly "up to speed" and their professionalism is to be immediately placed under public scrutiny. Propaganda is not journalism. Parroting ideology or a narrow-angle view is not journalism. We are watching with precision what now parades daily before us. We expect the use of public money to be scrutinized. We expect the antics of organised criminals to be exposed. We expect the national interest of all Fiji Taxpayers to be served ahead of conflicted interest and selfish greed.

We are watching.
sara'ssista said…
Oh what garbage. Journalists can at least now investigate and report (apparently) without fear. Lets see them print some stories they have been keen to print but haven't been allowed to, about this regime, their cronies and their tactics. You can't keep blaming the media when they haven't been allowed to report freely for years. Whwen the truth has presented itself , they haven't been allowed to print it because of this regime , so don't go lecturing anyone. I look forward to Commander Keen being referred to as a convicted criminal in every media report and some investigative journalism into every death and assualt and scandal connected with this regime. What taxpayers money are you talking about? You have had no say in where that is spent for how many years??

Popular posts from this blog

Lessons from Africa

Fijian Holdings Scandal: Betrayal by their trusted sons

The Ratu Tevita Saga, Coup4.5, Michael Field, the ANU Duo, and Tonga